Pointing Dogs Made Easy
by
Steven Mulak
POINTING DOGS MADE EASY:
How to train, nurture and
appreciate your bird dog
When I talk about this book, I tell people
that I am responsible for everything except the title. In truth, the
working title for this book was The Pointing Addiction, but the
word “addiction” sent up a red flag at the publisher’s office. I was
persuaded we could sell a lot more books if we changed the title. And
they were right: To date, none of my books has sold anywhere near what
PDME has realized.
I wrote Pointing Dogs Made Easy
because I believe a book on dog training techniques does not have to
read like a text book. I tried to cloak instruction and tips in
entertaining prose, and believe lessons are more digestible that way.
The first excerpt below is an example of my non-instructional
instruction. There are recommendations and some strong opinions in here
and even an original theory (See Chapter 8, Life Cycles and the
Complete Bird Dog) all of it immersed in stories of my own successes
and failures with bird dogs.
The success of this book has a great deal
to do with the fact that I am not a mass-producer of bird dogs. Books
written by professional trainers are usually inappropriate for the
amateur, sometimes profoundly so. Training dogs one-at-a-time is an
altogether different game that requires a much more personal approach,
and the best compliments I’ve received on PDME are addressed to that
fact.
The other aspect of this book that makes it
unique among dog training books is that I treat each dog as the
individual he is. I’ve been around dogs long enough to have long ago
realized that the only “typical English setter” is one that you don’t
know. Once you get to know a dog—any dog—it becomes apparent that he is
different from all the others. They are each individuals, and my
training philosophy addresses and celebrates that uniqueness.
I had a lot of fun writing this book, mostly because I was able to
compile all the good stories I had been telling for years about bird
dogs. Whenever I’ve been asked to do a reading, I try to select a
passage that is sure to make the audience laugh, and, in that respect,
I’ve always succeeded. The second sample from the book that I’ve
attached is one such passage.
This
book is available from the publisher, Countrysport/Down East. I’ve also
seen it for sale in a dozen places on line and at the Orvis store and at
Kittery Trading Post, (Not at L.L. Bean, though. I’ve never seen any of
my stuff in the book section Bean’s, in spite of all the good things I
have to say about that company.) As with all my books, if you’d like an
autographed copy, please contact me. As often as not, people buy books
for someone else, and I’ve been asked to write something nice about that
person in the flyleaf. I’m always glad to do that sort of thing.
(Excerpt
from Pointing Dogs Made Easy, chapter 4, Teaching Old Dogs New
Tricks)

"On
retrieving alone, any bird dog can earn his keep." Among hunters, you
won't get many arguments regarding the validity of that sentiment. The
worst bird dog that ever wagged a tail certainly has more ability to
locate a hiding cripple than you and me and a dozen other fellows
crawling around the covert on our hands and knees, peeking under every
bush and deadfall.
The retrieves that
bird dogs make on TV outdoor shows make for lovely pictures. Yet, to a
dogless hunter, those same shows make retrieving dogs appear as nothing
more than a frivolous luxury that he can easily do without—Anyone, after
all, can be his own retriever so long as the birds are centered and fall
cleanly on open ground, as they always do on TV. Ah, but in the real
world, no hunter is as consistent as he would like to be. Hunters make
mistakes. Retrieving bird dogs correct them.
There is a
game that I play in the back yard with my dogs. It's fun and good
training at the same time. The dogs are told to sit while I walk the far
end of the yard, mostly pretending to plant a pheasant wing in any of
several places. (They don't seem to be clever enough to watch closely
and see where I actually hide the wing.) Once done, I walk to a distant
spot and call them to me, make them heel for a few steps, then tell them
to "Find dead." There ensues some wonderful competition in what is a
high-speed search, and often times a bit of "In-your-face" bravado as
the winner brings in the wing. After a while, I'm sure the wing smells
of nothing more than dog spit, but the main idea of the game is that
each dog is using his nose competitively. Along the way, the game gives
me a chance to enforce a dozen different field commands.
It same
lesson can be applied to hunting: When you drop a bird, put Sparkey at
heel and go immediately to where you marked the bird down. Make the dog
sit for a few seconds – hopefully that will calm him down a notch or
two. Then, with all the calm you can muster, say "dead bird", or
whatever command you use. In his early training, this phase might be
accomplished on a leash to give the dog the idea that he should, at
least at the outset, search in a short radius around you for the scent.
Because
Sparkey needs to be calm, you need to be calm. You might not
realize it, but the dog is taking clues from you, and if you're excited,
he figures there must be something to be excited about. Letting Sparkey
break point to make the retrieve gets him pumped up at the exact wrong
time: He needs to be methodical about that retrieving business.
"Fetch" should be
the all-encompassing command—fetch means "Do the whole thing right".
I've caught myself saying "No!" when the dog drops the wing she's
retrieving. The command that accompanies the replacing of the wing in
the dog's mouth should be "fetch".
Some
bird dogs don't need to be taught. You throw a ball, Sparkey chases it
and brings it back to you. You can keep throwing the ball until your arm
falls off and he'll keep running it back. It doesn't take the same dog
long to figure out that when you shoot a bird, his job is to find it and
bring it to you. Sparkey—and this goes for most Sparkeys—loves
to play fetch.
Having
said that, I need to say this:
A "fetch" command
is useless unless the dog has been force trained to retrieve. Otherwise,
it's like an "eat" command when you put a bowl of food in front of
him—If he feels like eating, you don't need a command. If he doesn't,
you can stand there and say "eat" until next Sunday, but he probably
isn't going to obey. You haven't taught him to obey “eat" any more than
you've taught Sparkey to "fetch" by throwing the ball that he wanted
thrown in the first place You don't have a command, you have a cheer.
My setter Stella
was Sparkey with the ball. She never needed to be taught, and retrieved
every grouse and woodcock I shot over her during her first season. But I
have a photo sequence of her taken in December of '89: That's her,
swimming across a river and climbing onto the shelf ice on the other
side. That's her, too, walking to the black duck I had shot. And this is
her, looking back at me with an expression that says, "You want me to
fetch this? Are you kidding?"
The
photos that I don’t have on that sub-freezing day are of me
walking well upstream and getting wet anyway in order to make my own
retrieve of that duck.
A dog that has
been force trained to retrieve will fetch anything he's told to—a goose,
a pheasant, a beer can, a rock. Further, the process of force training
produces a series of routines that can immediately be used as a fast
one-minute refresher course on a non-performing dog in the field
to get him back to par. Although I haven't had a lot of luck teaching
it, the NAVHDA folks have a step-by-step method that has worked for some
of my hunting partner's dogs.
I just
wish I had missed that duck.
(Excerpt
from Pointing Dogs Made Easy, chapter 6, Care and Maintenance of
the Athletic Hunting Dog)

Many dog owners like to brag about
their dogs being “briar busters," the inference being that the dog has a
lot of "heart" and displays the admirable trait of "eagerness to hunt".
Since most dogs eventually outgrow their kamikaze tendencies, a puppy's
willingness to plunge headfirst through thorns in truth indicates only
that he has a lot to learn.
During her early years, Amy was a
notorious briar buster. When it came to thorns, she didn't seem to give
a damn. Her coat was not thick, but she had the other prerequisite - a
thick skull. By the end of the hunting season most of the fur on the
fronts of her legs and chest had been replaced by scar tissue. No
kidding. If she had been made of metal, she would have been very, very
shiny.
Once, during her second season, a
briar cut the tip of her ear. No big deal, I thought, and we kept going.
But each time she ran a step, the ear flew around like a piece of
laundry in the wind, and the clotting that would have happened in any
other small cut never took hold. Within five minutes her head and
shoulders were covered with a fine mist of blood. Leaves and bugs were
stuck to her in a big gory mess. She looked like an extra from a canine
horror movie.
I got her home and washed her down in
the cellar set tub. Using gauze, I bandaged the ear tip, but I was
reluctant to use adhesive tape. Anyone who has ever pulled a band-aid
off a hairy forearm knows how excruciating that sort of pain can be -
It's got to be the same for dog fur. So instead, I used an Ace bandage.
I carefully wrapping the dog's head so that the ear was immobilized, and
there was just the smallest piece of adhesive tape in actual contact
with her fur. Amy curled up on her bed in the cellar and looked up at me
with love in her eyes. Even Susan made a non-sarcastic remark about me
being a considerate dog owner. For one fleeting moment, I felt like
Saint Francis of Assisi.
What a fool.
Two hours later, I went back into the
cellar to see how Amy was doing. As is the wont of all dogs with
bandages, she had pawed at it until it came off. Of course, she started
shaking her head. Of course, the cut re-opened. The cellar floor and
the bottom half of the freezer and the washing machine and the clothes
dryer and my work bench —everything—had an atomized coating of blood
spatter on it. A casual observer might have concluded my cellar was a
place where I regularly slaughtered pigs with dull implements.
The milk of human kindness instantly
went sour. Amy got a much less gentle second wash down, then there was
an ample use of adhesive tape in the re-bandaging of her ear.
But that's not the end of the story.
With one ear taped over, she had trouble with directional hearing, and
for the next week of hunting we had a great many "discussions" about our
difference of opinion regarding her range.
And then, when the adhesive tape
started to shrink a bit, I noticed Amy's eyes seemed to be open very,
very wide. It became an expression she wore. Until I re-taped the
bandage, there was nothing in the world that she resembled quite so much
as a dog that had been electrocuted and lived.
* * *
Home
This site was last updated
06/07/06
|